In conclusion, he recommended the continuation of the Health and Wellness Center to allow for a two-year time frame for analysis comparison.
Human Resources Director Hollowell responded to questions from Councilor Thomas as it relates to the efforts being made to encourage city employees to participate in the Health and Wellness Center by explaining the marketing and educational efforts.
Mr. Goldstein responded to questions from Councilor Allen regarding the cost savings to the city; since, it has been mentioned the savings to the city employees. Human Resources Director Hollowell explained that Transform HealthRx would be better served in addressing the specifics related to employee health. She then introduced the following individuals representing Transform HealthRx seated in the audience: Ms. Allison Judd- Co-Owner of Transform HealthRx, Mr. Larry Steele and Ms. Shannon Melton.
Ms. Allison Judd- Transform HealthRx, came forward to offer a power point presentation on the Health and Wellness Center. (A copy of the power point presentation was filed for the record.) She briefly outlined the topics not discussed during earlier presentations and a summarization is provided as follows:
o Diabetic Supplies
---------------------------------------*** *** ***-------------------------------------- CITY ATTORNEY'S AGENDA:
THE FOLLOWING ORDINANCE WAS SUBMITTED AND EXPLAINED BY CITY ATTORNEY FAY WITH AN INCONCLUSIVE VOTE FOR ACTION BY THE COUNCIL ON SECOND READING:__ ___
An Ordinance - Amending Chapter 2 of the Columbus Code so as to increase the number of directors of the Development Authority of Columbus, Georgia from seven to nine; and for other purposes. Mayor Pro Tem Turner Pugh moved its adoption. Seconded by Councilor Woodson that resulted in an inconclusive vote for action. Mayor Pro Tem Turner Pugh and Councilors Allen, Barnes, Huff and Woodson voted yes; Councilors Baker, Henderson, McDaniel and Thomas voted no with Councilor Davis being absent from the meeting.
An Ordinance - Amending Chapter 2 so as to provide that segments of the Columbus Riverwalk may be named in honor of living individuals; and for other purposes. Mayor Pro Tem Turner Pugh moved it be defeated. Seconded by Councilor Henderson and was defeated by a vote of six to three with Mayor Pro Tem Turner Pugh and Councilors Allen, Baker, Henderson, McDaniel and Woodson voting in favor of the motion to defeat and Councilors Barnes, Huff and Thomas voting against the motion to defeat with Councilor Davis being absent from the meeting. ------------------------------------------------------------*** *** ***------------------------------------------------------------------------- PUBLIC HEARING: THE FOLLOWING ORDINANCE AMENDING THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE OF COLUMBUS, GEORGIA WAS SUBMITTED AND EXPLAINED BY CITY ATTORNEY FAY AND INTRODUCED ON FIRST READING: An Ordinance - Text amendment to the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) providing for the Manchester Expressway Overlay District. The Planning Advisory Commission and the Planning Department recommend approval. Planning Department Director Mr. Rick Jones came forward to explain that with the overlay district, there would be requirements for putting in esthetic qualities along Manchester Expressway from Beaver Run/ J R Allen Parkway, 1000 feet on either side, all the way to the county line going all the way up Manchester Expressway. He recalled that our community already has overlay districts. He further explained the factors built into an overlay district and the reasons staff is moving forward with this. Councilor Barnes expressed the reasons he is not in support of overlay districts to include the impact and financial constraints on small “mom and pop” businesses. Councilor Allen commented on the number of emails he has received with it being over 100 emails representing roughly 200 family members in support of the overlay district, and only two that were in opposition. PROPONENTS: Mr. Tom Flournoy- 8000 Midland Road, provided some historical information on overlay districts to include the establishment of the Panhandle Planning Group. Planning Department Director Jones briefly explained that overlays just lay on top of the existing zoning classification; it does not change the zoning underneath it. The overlay also requires additional esthetic qualities. The following individuals also came forward to offer their support for the ordinance and are listed as follows: Mrs. Lucille Flournoy- 8000 Midland Road, Mr. Milton Jones- 3438 Sue Mack Drive, Mr. Robert Bollinger- 1055 Cross Winds and Ms. Francis Malone- 12296 Randalwoods Drive. OPPONENTS: Mr. Andrew Roney-3323 Hilton Woods Drive and Mr. Jeff Hudson- 2725 Lookout Drive, representing CBS Outdoor, came forward to express their opposition due to the overlay district’s prohibition of any billboards in that corridor. He pointed out that there is no option to go before the Board of Zoning Appeals; no outdoor billboard company is allowed to appeal before the Board of Zoning Appeals. Mr. Roney explained that this would be the first overlay district that does not already have billboards. The individuals that appeared before the Council in opposition are continued below: Mr. Todd Ammerman- 6922 Jamison Way, Mr. Marty Flournoy. Planning Department Director Jones explained to Mr. Ammerman that his business is currently in Highway US80 Overlay District. He further added that rather the area lies wholly or partially, the overlay district guidelines must be in compliance. -------------------------------------------------------------*** *** ***------------------------------------------------------------------ NOTE: Councilor McDaniel left the meeting during this portion of the proceedings at approximately 8:05 p.m. Councilor Allen left the meeting at approximately 8:27 p.m. -----------------------------------------------------------*** *** ***-----------------------------------------------------------------
Finance Director Hodge came forward to advise of how monies from salary savings was moved around to other line items within the Marshal’s budget. She further explained that $52,000 out of personnel salary savings have been transferred to other lines but not to the motor fuel line item. She then provided a breakdown of the amounts transferred and to the line items the money was transferred into.
At this time, Assistant Chief Deputy Marshal Moore responded to various questions relating to the Marshal’s Office budget along with Finance Director Hodge also making some additional comments. Assistant Chief Deputy Marshal Moore also determined that the vehicles would be parked if funding for fuel is not approved.
Councilor Henderson asked if the Marshal’s Office would be amenable to borrowing the money from the fund balance and replenish it out of the Marshal’s FY15 budget, which means that the FY15 would be short by the $13,500 or the amount used for motor fuel. Councilor Huff made a motion to amend the budget to cover the shortfall for motor fuel. Seconded by Councilor Woodson. After discussions had concluded, Councilor Woodson then made a substitute motion to continue to allow the Marshal’s Office to get motor fuel until the Council comes back on June 10, 2014; however, if the Administration has not found any other funding source; then, the monies would be taken from the FY15 budget. Seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Turner Pugh and after some additional discussion, the motion carried unanimously by those seven members present with Councilors Allen and McDaniel being absent for the vote and Councilor Davis being absent from the meeting. Probate Court: Finance Director Hodge advised that there are two requests being made by Probate Court Judge D’Antonio. She explained that there has been a change of process in that the attorneys were being paid out of the revenues collected before it is transmitted to the City; however, now the City is receiving the gross revenue and they are paying out the attorney fees causing his budget to go over. She explained that due to the change is process, the request is an increase of revenue of $25,000 and an increase to his departmental budget of $25,000. Judge Mark D’Antonio- Probate Court approached the rostrum to request that $73.71 be added to his FY14 budget so he would be able to pay his Chief Clerk for work she has already been doing since the middle of March. Using a power point presentation, he then explained his proposed reorganization with the net difference for FY2015 being $426. (A copy of the power point presentation was filed for the record.)He further explained that he wants to pay the Chief Clerk for four and a half pay periods during FY14, which comes to a net of $73.71. City Attorney Fay advised that the $73.71 could be approved tonight; however, the reclassification would need to be in ordinance form. Councilor Thomas then made a motion to approve the $73.71. Seconded by Councilor Woodson, which carried unanimously by those seven members present with Councilors Allen and McDaniel being absent for the vote and Councilor Davis being absent from the meeting.
---------------------------------------------------------------------*** *** ***--------------------------------------------------------- CLERK OF COUNCIL’S AGENDA: Due to the lateness of the hour, the Clerk of Council’s Agenda was deferred until the next regularly scheduled meeting.